|M240 with M-Rokkor 40mm F/2. 1/250th sec F/5.6 @ ISO 1600|
By using these 30 year old lenses designed for film on this modern digital camera body felt a bit like putting 30 year old tires on a McLaren P1. Sure the tires will fit, but will it be able to optimize on the capabilities of this modern supercar, or will it hold it back? These made for film, made in Japan M-Rokkor lenses will easily fit onto the new Leica M240, but will we be able to see the true capabilities of this newly designed, CMOS sensored, full-frame body? Let's see...
Build Quality, Ergonomics, Feel
|Ricoh GR-D IV. 1/64th F/2.8 @ ISO 200|
There's also a few new control features that take a while to get use to, especially if you're a long time M user. There's an odd movie button on the top plate near the shutter button that's not programable or lockable. I don't think too many M shooters will use their cameras to shoot movies and would appreciate the ability to change the function of the button to something else more useful. The rear thumb dial is nice, making certain functions quicker and more intuitive; but the front button is oddly placed and hard to use. I don't think I used it once.
|Leica M240 with M-Rokkor 90mm F/4. 1/500th sec F/6.8 @ ISO 1600. RAW and converted in CS5|
Another big change is the electronic frame lines inside the optical viewfinder. Instead of the frame line gathering window and the mechanical way the old M bodies would show the frame lines inside the viewfinder; the new camera will either auto detect the frame lines, or you can manually pick the lines you want to see. I think this is more flexible, although maybe not quicker. For instance, if you're using adapter to mount non-M lenses, it would be easy enough to manually pick the frame lines you want to see. For myself, I found that no matter what lighting condition, the red or white electronically projected lines were easy to see and a pleasure to use.
Overall, the build quality of the new M is amazing. It's the best built camera body I've held in a very long time, better than the Leica M Monochrom and X-Vario that I recently tested. It's not just another M with slight upgrades, but is a big leap from the previous M bodies in both technology, ergonomics, and build quality. If you own an M9, it's definitely worth considering an upgrade, unless you are vehemently against the idea of taking better images at higher ISO with more control features. Remember, you're also going from CCD to CMOS technology, a move that some photographers don't want to make (M Monochrom, M9, M8 are all CCD).
|Leica M240 with 40mm F/2. 1/500th sec F/6.8 @ ISO1250. Shooting through a window. Nice colour rendition.|
I think many of us affectionately talk about the good old days and how everything was made better when we were young, and to some extent, this is very true. However, in some areas, the past is the past. Think of the original cell phones, laptop computers, CRT televisions. How about old lenses from the 60's, 70's, even 80's? One thing that was lacking back then (pre-80's) was multi-coating lenses to reduce light refraction and partial reflection; and those that did have some sort of lens coating tended to wear off over time. Minolta's collaboration with Leica to create the CLE and CL line of compact M mount rangefinders in the 70's and 80's wasn't a complete failure, but it wasn't much of a success. The rage was SLRs and zoom lenses at that time, and the major players were racing to be the first to come out with an autofocus SLR system. Rangefinder technology was considered old tech, and the public wasn't lining up to buy well made, manual focus rangefinder prime lenses.
|Top to Bottom: 28mm F/2.8, 40mm F/2, 90mm F/4|
All three lenses, the 28mm F/2.8, 40mm F/2 and 90mm F/4 were all made in Japan and were decent build quality, but not without some issues. The lens coating on the 28mm lens has been known for spotting and hazing, and my sample has both. In the shade with no direct light hitting the lens, the images had sort of a soft filter look. If the sun hit into the lens, the images were useless. The 40mm lens had no coating issues, but also suffered from direct sunlight contact, an issue much improved upon newer lenses. The 90mm lens had no issues with flare, although the images seemed overly saturated. Of the 3 lenses, I enjoyed using the 40mm lens the best. If the exposure and lighting was right, the images were spectacular, almost matching the more modern Leica M lenses. Overall, decent performance, but it did feel like I was using old technology.
In the Field
Let's get shooting with the M240 and the M-Rokkor lenses. It may seem odd that I'll start this section by talking about the battery life of the new M, but this is an important 'in the field' aspect of any camera. It has an all new 7.4V 1800mAh 13.32Wh battery, and it's huge! It's the biggest battery I've seen in a non-DSLR body. I can easily shoot all day and still have 2-3 bars left on its 5 bar battery indicator. This makes sense since there's no AF, no EVF (optional), and if you turn off the rear LCD screen, you can get even longer life. Let's just say that you don't really need a back-up battery if you don't want one. I could confidently shoot all day and not worry about my batteries dying on me, something I worry about when shooting with almost any other camera (with the exception of the Ricoh GR-D IV).
|Leica M240 with M-Rokkor 40mm F/2. 1/250th sec F/4.8 @ ISO 250|
|Leica M240 with M-Rokkor 40mm F/2. 1/250th sec F/4.8 @ ISO 250. 80% crop of original image. Nice detail|
One major reason you would use the LV mode is if you're using non M-mount lenses via an adapter, such as an R-mount Leica lens. There's no way you can frame or focus with a telephoto lens with the OVF (eg. 180mm F/2), so the rear LCD LV mode would definitely come in handy.
Shooting with the new M can still feel like shooting with an old film M, as long as you don't get too fancy. Set your ISO and resolution ahead of time, and the rest you can adjust externally via dials or the lens. However, if you decide to shoot jpegs, create shooting profiles, shoot video, or anything else more complicated, then you have to dig into the menus, something I didn't really enjoy. It's not that the menus are confusing, but I'm not use to the Leica set up. For instance, to adjust shooting parameters, you need to know what's in MENU versus the SET folder. If you want to access ISO, WB, File Format, Jpeg Res, Video Res, Exp Comp, Ex. Metering, User Profiles, then you hit the SET button. Everything else is in the main MENU folder. I know Leica wants to keep the external control as classic as possible, but times have changed. We need more dials and control knobs and other externally accessible functions. They've added a new dial on the back, and a new button on the front and top, which is a big step for a Leica M. How about adding user assignable buttons and dials?
|Leica M240 with M-Rokkor 28mm F/2. 1/500th F/5.6 @ ISO 800. Lens very hazy with backlit image|
Leica assumes most M users will shoot RAW and manually expose their images, so they designed the camera with this type of photography and photographer in mind. Adjusting white balance, accessing exposure compensation and changing ISO wasn't as fast as other cameras. In practice, I didn't really use JPEGs except as a thumbnail to find my images faster once downloaded; so slow access to certain features was more of an irritation, and not a hindrance to getting good images.
One feature I would recommend turning off for those who like to always have the camera ready to shoot is the Auto Power Off. Since I don't use the Live View mode to shoot, it wasn't really necessary to try and conserve battery life. My priority was to have the camera ready to shoot as soon as I press the shutter button, and not wait for a 5 second delay as the camera woke up, like the Fuji X-mount cameras!! With Auto Power Off turned off, the camera was always ready to shoot, just the way I like it...
I had a great time shooting with the M240 camera. I do wish I had a Leica lens to shoot with, but I won't whine about it. I got to shoot with the latest, greatest Leica M! Shooting with Minolta M-Rokkor lenses was a lot of fun, but I can say for a certainty that those older lenses can not keep up to the newer Leica M-mount lenses. Under certain conditions the 40mm F/2 shot beautifully, but as soon as there was the slightest back-lighting, the image flared up and lost contrast. The top-of-the-line M body requires newer, more modern lenses if you are serious about image quality.
|Leica M240 with M-Rokkor 90mm F/4. 1/2000th sec F/5.6 @ ISO 1600.|
|M240 w/M-Rokkor 40mm. 1/500th F/6.8 @ ISO 250|
|Leica M240 with M-Rokkor 40mm F/2. 1/3000th sec F/9.5 @ ISO 800.|
The shooting experience with the M240 is a more thoughtful and deliberate. It's easier to make a mistake when shooting, but the reward of getting a great shot is greater as well, knowing YOU took the shot and not the camera and its pre-programmed algorithms. It was also nice to be able to get full-frame images from such a reasonably small body. Once I got my RAW files on screen, it was a pleasure to work with such large files, with room to crop and lots of exposure lattitude, something that isn't possible with my other cameras. It felt like my old film days of working in the darkroom, cropping, dodging, burning....I was in control of the final image with lots of freedom to do what I wanted. That's what I got from shooting with a full-frame Leica M body: a sense of control. Is that important to you? It is to me.
Thanks to Leica Canada for loaning me this camera. I look forward to testing it in the future with a proper Leica lens so I can get the most out of the new sensor and new design of the M240. I did get a good sense of the new body though, and I think its a big step in the right direction. Yes, there's competition coming up very soon with similar specs, but I don't think Leica has to worry. A Leica is a Leica. It will always have a certain reputation and glamour and function that the other Japanese brands may always try to achieve, but will take many more years to obtain...and this is coming from a Japanese guy... who loves Japanese cameras!! Ha ha. Thanks for viewing and happy shooting!!
Check out my review of the M Monochrom here!
Check out my review of the X-Vario here!
This comment has been removed by the author.ReplyDelete
Just a quick question - you mentioned that you can manually choose framelines for the 40mm lens. Do these framelines continue to be shown or is it just a "preview" of sorts. This would keep one from having to modify the 40mm to get the 35mm fames to come up. Thanks,ReplyDelete
Hey Jordan, sorry for my late response. I'm in Tokyo right now and was having trouble with my computer and also got sick at the same time!! Anyway, what I meant was you can manually choose the framelines from a pre-determined list by Leica, and unfortunately they don't currently sell a 40mm lens so no 40mm frame lines!! You have to either shoot with the 35mm lines and minus a bit or shoot with the 50mm lines and add a bit more... it's a small hassle, but hey, if it's accuracy you're looking for, you'll have to shoot using the rear screen (not fun on an M) or just shoot with a DSLR right? Ha ha!! Thanks for the question and sorry again for taking so long to respond.Delete
That is awesome - like I said that will keep one from modifying the 40mm to get 35mm frames. It would probably be close enough for me, no reason NOT to use the rangefinder you are right - that is the whole point of an M! Hope you feel better soon,Delete
Thanks for this review.
I'm having focus shift issue using my M-Rokkor 90mm on my M246. It seems to focus further than intended point of focus. Also, I'm not getting sharp pictures. I have no problem with the 50mm Summicron and Voigtlander 21mm f1.8.
May I ask what lens profile do you use for the M-Rokkor 90mm? I'm using 90 f4 11633/11634. Is it possible I'm on the wrong profile?
Your website is really cool and this is a great inspiring article. http://myonlinemuseum.orgReplyDelete